OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $661 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 86/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 3,079,298).

The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno 16 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Cheaper: $661 vs $899

  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 3079298
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2680
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 8358
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 80W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 1 points higher (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100).

OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Reno 16 Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3079298 3269794
Geekbench Single 2680 3228
Geekbench Multi 8358 9553
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 80W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 226 g
Price $661 $899
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +5.8%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 5.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $238. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $238.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno 16 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.