Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 88/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 3,326,259).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 3326259
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 6510 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $899

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 94/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 226g vs 227g

  • Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 1 points higher (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 4602290 3326259
Geekbench Single 3639 3293
Geekbench Multi 11047 10243
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 1260x2800
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7400 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 120W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB / 24GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 227 g 226 g
Launch price $799 $899

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
4602290 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 -38.4%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Vivo X300 Pro by 38.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $100. Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (96/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 94/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.