Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo X300s
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 77/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo X300s
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 10243
- Overall rating 77/100
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 12 points higher (89/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (94/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 10243 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Weight | — | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Apple iPhone Fold by 31.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (94/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone Fold — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo X300s?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo X300s?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.