Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $999 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 73/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,870,000).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Performance 85
Display 85
Camera 86
Battery 24
Portability 56
Value for money 58
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 2680

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (56/100 vs 54/100)
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1870000
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 8300
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3582 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
  • Cheaper: $661 vs $999

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 86/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 13 points higher (86/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (83/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (84/100 vs 58/100).

Apple iPhone 16 Pro: The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 16 Pro OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Processor Apple A18 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 1870000 3079298
Geekbench Single 3400 2680
Geekbench Multi 8300 8358
Display 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2622x1206 2772x1272
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3582 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 27W 80W
Wireless charging 25W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS iOS 18 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g
Price $999 $661
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
  • 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2622x1206
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
  • 3582 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 25W
24
battery
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro
73/100
1870000 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100 +39.3%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 39.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
$999
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661

Price difference: $338. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $338.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 86/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (83/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (84/100 vs 58/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 86/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.