OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $661 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 48/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 607,137).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 76/100)
- Cheaper: $130 vs $661
- Better portability (69/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 38 points higher (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (89/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (69/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Price | $661 | $130 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 407.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $531. Samsung Galaxy M17 is cheaper by $531.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (89/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (69/100 vs 54/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 38 points (86/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.