Nothing Phone (2) vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Nothing Phone (2) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $599 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 63/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,436,634); the Nothing Phone (2) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) by 25 points (88/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (2)

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 57
Battery 50
Portability 52
Value for money 40

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Nothing Phone (2) better?

  • Lighter: 201g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $899

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1436634
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4200
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (2) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 25 points higher (88/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (2) — 40/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Nothing Phone (2) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2) is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

Nothing Phone (2): The Nothing Phone (2) is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (2) Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1436634 3326259
Geekbench Single 1500 3293
Geekbench Multi 4200 10243
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 / Nothing OS 2.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 162.1×76.4×8.6 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 201 g 226 g
Launch price $599 $899

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (2)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (2)

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (2)

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (2) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
63/100
1436634 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +56.8%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Nothing Phone (2) by 56.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (2)

$599

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $300. Nothing Phone (2) was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (94/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Nothing Phone (2) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (96/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (81/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2) is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) by 25 points (88/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2) and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nothing Phone (2) has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2) over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nothing Phone (2) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.