Nothing Phone (4a) vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $349 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 62/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,039,119); the Nothing Phone (4a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 26 points (88/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (4a)

Performance 60
Display 80
Camera 61
Battery 53
Portability 59
Value for money 58

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Nothing Phone (4a) better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $899

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1039119
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3168
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (4a) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 26 points higher (88/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (4a) — 58/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

Nothing Phone (4a): The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (4a) Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1039119 3326259
Geekbench Single 1223 3293
Geekbench Multi 3168 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 190 g 226 g
Launch price $349 $899

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (4a) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
62/100
1039119 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +68.8%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Nothing Phone (4a) by 68.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (4a)

$349

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $550. Nothing Phone (4a) was $550 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (94/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (96/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (81/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 26 points (88/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (4a) and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nothing Phone (4a) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (4a) over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.