Nothing Phone (3) vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 77/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5150); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,371,693); the Nothing Phone (3) is noticeably lighter (198g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3) — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (3)

Performance 82
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 63
Portability 49
Value for money 68

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?

  • Lighter: 198g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $899

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (49/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2371693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6847
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5150 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (3) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 11 points higher (88/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3) — 68/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).

Nothing Phone (3): The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (3) Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2371693 3326259
Geekbench Single 2162 3293
Geekbench Multi 6847 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1260 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5150 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 65W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 198 g 226 g
Launch price $799 $899

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (3)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (3)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (3)

  • 5150 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (3) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
77/100
2371693 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +28.7%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Nothing Phone (3) by 28.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (3)

$799

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $100. Nothing Phone (3) was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (96/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (81/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3) — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3) and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nothing Phone (3) has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3) over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.