Nokia G100 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nokia G100 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 29/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 320,666); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia G100 doesn't; the Nokia G100 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G100
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Nokia G100 better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1065
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia G100 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 40 points higher (69/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (90/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (70/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (52/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G100 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (52/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G100 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.6×76.7×8.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Nokia G100
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Nokia G100
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia G100
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G100 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nokia G100 by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia G100
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (90/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (70/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 (52/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G100 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (52/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G100 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G100 by 40 points (69/100 vs 29/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G100 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia G100 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G100 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G100 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G100 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.