Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1499 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 57/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 918,508).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 208g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 53/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1499
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 21 points higher (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 22/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (64/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (68/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 918508 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3060 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3088x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 208 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 267.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra was $200 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (93/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (64/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (68/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 21 points (78/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.