Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 57/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 918,508); the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably lighter (208g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 42/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 208g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1799
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 29 points higher (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 22/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (98/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (71/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 918508 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3060 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3088x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 208 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 329.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (98/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (91/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (71/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.