Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1099 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 57/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 918,508).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 918508
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 208g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1299
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 53/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 19 points higher (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 22/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (57/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (58/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (68/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 918508 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3060 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3088x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.8×77.2×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 208 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra by 239.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $200. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $200 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (57/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (58/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (68/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.