Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 75/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 3,065,623); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 3065623
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2910
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9174
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $1999
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 66/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 54/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (76/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 1 points higher (76/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9174 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $1999 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 by 1.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $900. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is cheaper by $900.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (94/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (76/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (58/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.