Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $1799 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 80/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,251,381); the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is noticeably lighter (236g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2251381
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6511
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Lighter: 236g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $1499 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 3 points higher (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (81/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 6511 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 35.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $300. Vivo X Fold3 Pro was $300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Vivo X Fold3 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 84/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.