Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $1099 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 76/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 2,251,381); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 2251381
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1499
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Better camera (84/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro scores 4 points higher (80/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (84/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 6511 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 31.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $400. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $400 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads on camera score (84/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.