ZTE Axon 30S vs ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
The ZTE Axon 30S (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads — 65/100 vs 54/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4200); the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is faster in AnTuTu (1,119,714 vs 1,010,069).
ZTE Axon 30S
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 3373
- Overall rating 54/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1119714 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Single: 1488 vs 1298
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4200 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 189g
- Higher performance (63/100 vs 61/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (41/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the ZTE Axon 30S vs the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G scores 11 points higher (65/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads (71/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (71/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is a bit better (41/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 67/100.
| Specification | ZTE Axon 30S | ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.7" Super Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 55W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 170.2×77.8×7.8 mm | 161.5×73.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
ZTE Axon 30S
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
ZTE Axon 30S
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- 6.7" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 30S
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- 4600 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared ZTE Axon 30S and ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads ZTE Axon 30S by 9.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (71/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is a bit better (41/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 67/100.
Which is better: the ZTE Axon 30S or the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 30S — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the ZTE Axon 30S and the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 30S has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the ZTE Axon 30S or the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads on camera score (71/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the ZTE Axon 30S over the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 30S is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is a better fit for active users.