Motorola Signature vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $699 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 80/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 5200); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,251,381); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2251381
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6511
- Lighter: 186g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1499
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 84/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 77/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the Motorola Signature scores 6 points higher (86/100 vs 80/100). Value score: Motorola Signature — 86/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (78/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 35.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $800. Motorola Signature was $800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (78/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Signature edges out the Vivo X Fold3 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 84/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.