Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; estimated prices are $1799 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 71/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 Pro mini has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,068,952); the Vivo S50 Pro mini is noticeably lighter (191g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3068952
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2903
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9602
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 62/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 191g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $485 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 6 points higher (77/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (76/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo S50 Pro mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9602 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 191 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $485 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo S50 Pro mini by 28.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1314. Vivo S50 Pro mini is cheaper by $1314.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (92/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (91/100 vs 62/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (73/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (61/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (76/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Vivo S50 Pro mini by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 62/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.