Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 79/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 Pro mini has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,974,201); the Vivo S50 Pro mini is noticeably lighter (191g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo S50 Pro mini
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2974201
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Vivo S50 Pro mini better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Lighter: 191g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $485 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 4 points higher (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (81/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo S50 Pro mini — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo S50 Pro mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2974201 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 9119 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $485 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo S50 Pro mini by 2.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1314. Vivo S50 Pro mini was $1314 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (91/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Vivo S50 Pro mini by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.