Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 71/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 Pro mini has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,068,952).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3068952
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2903
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9602
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 68/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 191g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $485 vs $1099
- Better camera (62/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 2 points higher (73/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (76/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (62/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (76/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Vivo S50 Pro mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9602 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 191 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $485 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Vivo S50 Pro mini by 28.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $614. Vivo S50 Pro mini is cheaper by $614.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (92/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (62/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (73/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (76/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Vivo S50 Pro mini by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.