Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo S50 Pro mini

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; estimated prices are $1236 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads — 80/100 vs 76/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 Pro mini has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 3,068,952).

The Vivo S50 Pro mini edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Vivo S50 Pro mini
Performance 91
Display 85
Camera 64
Battery 81
Portability 64
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 3068952
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2903
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Vivo S50 Pro mini better?
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
  • Lighter: 191g vs 199g
  • Cheaper: $485 vs $1236

  • Better camera (64/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Vivo S50 Pro mini scores 4 points higher (80/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo S50 Pro mini: The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Vivo S50 Pro mini
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 3113462 3068952
Geekbench Single 3041 2903
Geekbench Multi 9494 9602
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1216x2640
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 68W 90W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm
Weight 199 g 191 g
Price $1236 $485
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Vivo S50 Pro mini
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Vivo S50 Pro mini
  • 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Vivo S50 Pro mini
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Vivo S50 Pro mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
80/100 -1.5%
3068952 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo S50 Pro mini by 1.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1236
Vivo S50 Pro mini
$485

Price difference: $751. Vivo S50 Pro mini is cheaper by $751.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The Vivo S50 Pro mini edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 80/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The Vivo S50 Pro mini leads on camera score (64/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.