Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads — 79/100 vs 76/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 Pro mini has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo S50 Pro mini is faster in AnTuTu (2,974,201 vs 2,962,094).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo S50 Pro mini
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9119
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Vivo S50 Pro mini better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2974201 vs 2962094
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Lighter: 191g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $485 vs $1099
- Better camera (64/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Vivo S50 Pro mini scores 3 points higher (79/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo S50 Pro mini — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo S50 Pro mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 2974201 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9119 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $485 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo S50 Pro mini leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 0.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $614. Vivo S50 Pro mini was $614 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini leads on camera score (64/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.