Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; launch prices were $1799 and $273. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 53/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 840,353); the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro by 30 points (83/100 vs 53/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

Performance 55
Display 79
Camera 33
Battery 56
Portability 54
Value for money 50

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 840353
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3000
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 206g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $273 vs $1799

  • Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 30 points higher (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (91/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Fold Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
AnTuTu 3057215 840353
Geekbench Single 2833 1013
Geekbench Multi 9119 3000
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 5 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 16, up to 6 major OS updates, One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP64
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 162.4×78.2×8.1 mm
Weight 285 g 206 g
Launch price $1799 $273

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 12MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100
3057215 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
53/100 -263.8%
840353 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro by 263.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

$273

Launch price difference: $1526. Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro was $1526 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (90/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (91/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro by 30 points (83/100 vs 53/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro — 53/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.