Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; launch prices were $1499 and $273. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 53/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 840,353).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 840353
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3000
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 206g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $273 vs $1499
- Overall rating 53/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 25 points higher (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 840353 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3000 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, up to 6 major OS updates, One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.4×78.2×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $273 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro by 302.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1226. Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro was $1226 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro (60/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro by 25 points (78/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro — 53/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.