Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy A27
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A27 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 51/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 840,353); the Motorola Razr Fold is thinner (4.7mm vs 7.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy A27
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 840353
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3000
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A27 better?
- Better portability (62/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy A27, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 32 points higher (83/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A27 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (68/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy A27 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 840353 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 3000 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 162.3×78.6×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | — | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A27
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A27
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy A27
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy A27, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy A27 by 263.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A27
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A27 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (91/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (68/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A27?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 by 32 points (83/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A27?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy A27 — 51/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A27?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A27?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy A27?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.