Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A27

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A27 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 51/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A27 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 840,353).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 by 25 points (76/100 vs 51/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62

Samsung Galaxy A27

Performance 55
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 44
Portability 62
Value for money —

What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 840353
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3000
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (57/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 62/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A27 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh

  • Overall rating 51/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A27, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 25 points higher (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Samsung Galaxy A27
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
AnTuTu 2962094 840353
Geekbench Single 3013 1013
Geekbench Multi 9287 3000
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1080x2340
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 162.3×78.6×7.9 mm
Weight 199 g —
Launch price $1099 —

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Samsung Galaxy A27

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Samsung Galaxy A27

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery

Samsung Galaxy A27

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A27, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
2962094 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A27 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
51/100 -252.5%
840353 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A27 by 252.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

$1099

Samsung Galaxy A27

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (91/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (57/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A27?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 by 25 points (76/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A27?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A27 — 51/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A27?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A27?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A27?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.