Motorola Razr Fold vs Poco C65
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; launch prices were $1799 and $99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 33/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 348,562); the Poco C65 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Poco C65
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $1799
- Better portability (63/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Poco C65, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 50 points higher (83/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Poco C65 — 56/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (90/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 1031 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $99 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Poco C65 by 777.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1700. Poco C65 was $1700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (90/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (68/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco C65?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 50 points (83/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Poco C65?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco C65?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco C65?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Poco C65?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.