Motorola Razr Fold vs Poco F8 Pro

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Poco F8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1799 and $529. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 71/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Pro has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,033,306); the Poco F8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Poco F8 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
Poco F8 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 68
Battery 66
Design 51
Value for money 73
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3033306
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9300

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Poco F8 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6210 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 199g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $529 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (73/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Poco F8 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 6 points higher (77/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (73/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (73/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Poco F8 Pro: The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Poco F8 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3942923 3033306
Geekbench Single 3640 3050
Geekbench Multi 11033 9300
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6210 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP68
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm
Weight 285 g 199 g
Price $1799 $529
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Poco F8 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
68
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Poco F8 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Poco F8 Pro
  • 6210 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:55 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Poco F8 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 -30.0%
3033306 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Poco F8 Pro by 30.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Poco F8 Pro
$529

Price difference: $1270. Poco F8 Pro is cheaper by $1270.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (92/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (91/100 vs 68/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (66/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (51/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (73/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco F8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Poco F8 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Poco F8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Poco F8 Pro — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco F8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 68/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco F8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Poco F8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for active users.