Motorola Razr Fold vs Poco F7 Pro

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1799 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 80/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,180,606); the Poco F7 Pro is noticeably lighter (220g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Poco F7 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 76
Poco F7 Pro
Performance 87
Display 90
Camera 67
Battery 87
Portability 46
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2180606
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 87/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
  • Lighter: 220g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $499 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 76/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 6 points higher (86/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 87/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (87/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Poco F7 Pro: The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Poco F7 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3942923 2180606
Geekbench Single 3640 3041
Geekbench Multi 11033 9494
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 68W 120W
Wireless charging 50W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP68
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm
Weight 285 g 220 g
Price $1799 $499
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Poco F7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
67
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100 -80.8%
2180606 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Poco F7 Pro by 80.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Poco F7 Pro
$499

Price difference: $1300. Poco F7 Pro is cheaper by $1300.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 87/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (91/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (87/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Poco F7 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 87/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.