Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Poco F7 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 76/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 2,301,212); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 220g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Poco F7 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 2301212
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 220g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1099
- Better camera (67/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 4 points higher (80/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (67/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Poco F7 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (68/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Poco F7 Pro by 28.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $600. Poco F7 Pro was $600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 87/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (68/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.