Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Poco F7 Pro

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 76/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,180,606); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 220g).

The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
Poco F7 Pro
Performance 87
Display 90
Camera 67
Battery 87
Portability 46
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2180606
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 220g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 87/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
  • Cheaper: $499 vs $1099

  • Better camera (67/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 4 points higher (80/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (67/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 64/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Poco F7 Pro: The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Poco F7 Pro
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3113462 2180606
Geekbench Single 3041 3041
Geekbench Multi 9494 9494
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 3200x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 68W 120W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm
Weight 199 g 220 g
Price $1099 $499
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Poco F7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
67
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100 -42.8%
2180606 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Poco F7 Pro by 42.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
Poco F7 Pro
$499

Price difference: $600. Poco F7 Pro is cheaper by $600.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 87/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (68/100 vs 46/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F7 Pro?

The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F7 Pro?

The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 87/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Poco F7 Pro?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.