Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Poco F9 Pro

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 76/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Pro has the bigger battery (6330 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 2,962,094); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.8mm).

The Poco F9 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62

Poco F9 Pro

Performance 95
Display 91
Camera 74
Battery 84
Portability 47
Value for money 82

What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?

  • Lighter: 199g vs 206g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 47/100)

What makes Poco F9 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 2962094
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 6330 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 165Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
  • Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 58/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 8 points higher (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (74/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (84/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F9 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (74/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (68/100 vs 47/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Poco F9 Pro: The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Poco F9 Pro
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2962094 3228426
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1156x2510
Refresh rate 165 Hz 185 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6330 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm
Weight 199 g 206 g
Launch price $1099 $699

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Poco F9 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1156x2510
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6330 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
2962094 AnTuTu
Poco F9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +8.2%
3228426 AnTuTu

Poco F9 Pro leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 8.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

$1099

Poco F9 Pro

$699

Launch price difference: $400. Poco F9 Pro was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F9 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (74/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (68/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco F9 Pro?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Poco F9 Pro?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.