Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Poco F9 Pro

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1499 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 78/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Pro has the bigger battery (6330 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,228,426); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.8mm).

The Poco F9 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Performance 92
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 66

Poco F9 Pro

Performance 95
Display 91
Camera 74
Battery 84
Portability 47
Value for money 82

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3228426
  • Lighter: 199g vs 206g

  • Better display (95/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 47/100)

What makes Poco F9 Pro better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 6330 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 165Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
  • Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1499

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 64/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 6 points higher (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (74/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (84/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Poco F9 Pro are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (84/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (68/100 vs 47/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Poco F9 Pro: The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Poco F9 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3379591 3228426
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1156x2510
Refresh rate 165 Hz 185 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6330 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm
Weight 199 g 206 g
Launch price $1499 $699

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Poco F9 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1156x2510
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6330 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Poco F9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 -4.7%
3228426 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Poco F9 Pro by 4.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

$1499

Poco F9 Pro

$699

Launch price difference: $800. Poco F9 Pro was $800 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Poco F9 Pro are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (84/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (68/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Poco F9 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Poco F9 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.