Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Poco F7 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1499 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 78/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,301,212); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 220g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Poco F7 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2301212
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 220g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1499
- Better camera (67/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 2 points higher (80/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Poco F7 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (92/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (68/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Poco F7 Pro by 46.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1000. Poco F7 Pro was $1000 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (92/100 vs 87/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (87/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (68/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.