Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; launch prices were $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 62/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4400); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,378,803); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 263g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1378803
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 263g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1799
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 14 points higher (76/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 28/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (68/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 1378803 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4688 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2176x1812 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 124 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 155.1×130.1×6.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 263 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $1799 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2176x1812
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 125.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $700. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $700 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (92/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (94/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (58/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (68/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 62/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a better fit for active users.