Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; launch prices were $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 62/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 1,378,803); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 263g).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 64

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 60
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 32

What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 1378803
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 263g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 better?


  • Overall rating 62/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 15 points higher (77/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 32/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100. In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (61/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (68/100 vs 52/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
AnTuTu 3126402 1378803
Geekbench Single 3013 1761
Geekbench Multi 9287 4688
Display 7.0" pOLED 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1224x2992 2176x1812
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 15W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 124
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 12
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 1200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IPX8
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 155.1×130.1×6.3 mm
Weight 199 g 263 g
Launch price $1099 $1799

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
60
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2176x1812
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3126402 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
62/100 -126.7%
1378803 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 126.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

$1099

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

$1799

Launch price difference: $700. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (91/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (95/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (61/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (68/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 62/100.

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a better fit for active users.