Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $1099 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 48/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 607,137).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1963
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $1099
- Better portability (69/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 28 points higher (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy M17 — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (92/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1963 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $130 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 412.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $969. Samsung Galaxy M17 was $969 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (92/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (57/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.