Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $1499 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 48/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 607,137).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1963
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $1499
- Better portability (69/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 30 points higher (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy M17 — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1963 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $130 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 456.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1369. Samsung Galaxy M17 was $1369 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (93/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (95/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (60/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.