Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy M17

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $1499 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 48/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 607,489).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Performance 92
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 66

Samsung Galaxy M17

Performance 46
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 69
Value for money 76

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 607489
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 960
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1826
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?

  • Lighter: 192g vs 199g
  • Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $1499

  • Better portability (69/100 vs 68/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 30 points higher (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy M17 — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy M17: The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Samsung Galaxy M17
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 3379591 607489
Geekbench Single 3013 960
Geekbench Multi 9287 1826
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1080x2340
Refresh rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 30W —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 50 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 512GB 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 1100 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP54
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 199 g 192 g
Launch price $1499 $130

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Samsung Galaxy M17

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Samsung Galaxy M17

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery

Samsung Galaxy M17

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M17 Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100 -456.3%
607489 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 456.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

$1499

Samsung Galaxy M17

$130

Launch price difference: $1369. Samsung Galaxy M17 was $1369 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (92/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (95/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (60/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.