Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M16
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 45/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 528,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy M16
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 65/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M16 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 191g vs 199g
- Overall rating 45/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy M16, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 31 points higher (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy M16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 1980 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy M16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M16 by 460.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (94/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (57/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 by 31 points (76/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy M16 — 45/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.