Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M16

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 45/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 524,785).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 by 35 points (80/100 vs 45/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 98
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 72
Samsung Galaxy M16
Performance 43
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 65
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 65/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M16 better?
  • Lighter: 191g vs 199g

  • Overall rating 45/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy M16, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 35 points higher (80/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy M16: The Samsung Galaxy M16 is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Samsung Galaxy M16
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 3942923 524785
Geekbench Single 3640 771
Geekbench Multi 11033 1980
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1080x2340
Refresh rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 50 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 800 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP54
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm
Weight 199 g 191 g
Launch price $1099
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Samsung Galaxy M16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Samsung Galaxy M16
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery
Samsung Galaxy M16
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy M16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
80/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M16 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
45/100 -651.3%
524785 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M16 by 651.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Samsung Galaxy M16
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (98/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (95/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (60/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (61/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M16?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 by 35 points (80/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy M16 — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M16?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M16?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy M16?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy M16 is a better fit for everyday use.