Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $1236 and $166. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 48/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 602,971).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Performance 47
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 602971
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 952
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1963
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 5G better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Lighter: 192g vs 199g
  • Cheaper: $166 vs $1236

  • Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 28 points higher (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (92/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 3113462 602971
Geekbench Single 3041 952
Geekbench Multi 9494 1963
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1080x2340
Refresh rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 30W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g 192 g
Price $1236 $166
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100 -416.4%
602971 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 416.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1236
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
$166

Price difference: $1070. Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is cheaper by $1070.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (92/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (94/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (57/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a better fit for everyday use.