Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $1099 and $166. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 48/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 603,772).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 603772
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1826
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 5G better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $166 vs $1099
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 28 points higher (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 603772 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 960 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 1826 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $166 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 390.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $933. Samsung Galaxy A17 5G was $933 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (91/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (94/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (57/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.