Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $1499 and $166. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 48/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 603,772).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 603772
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1826
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 5G better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $166 vs $1499
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 30 points higher (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 603772 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 960 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 1826 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $166 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 459.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1333. Samsung Galaxy A17 5G was $1333 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (92/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (95/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (60/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.