Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 48/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 602,971).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Performance 93
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Performance 47
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 602971
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 952
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1963
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 5G better?
  • Lighter: 192g vs 199g

  • Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 30 points higher (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 3379591 602971
Geekbench Single 3041 952
Geekbench Multi 9494 1963
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1080x2340
Refresh rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 30W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 50 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g 192 g
Price $166
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100 -460.5%
602971 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 460.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
$166
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (93/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (95/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (60/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 30 points (78/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a better fit for everyday use.