Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 45/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 548,631).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 548631
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 31 points higher (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 548631 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2047 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A17 4G by 467.5% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (92/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (94/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (57/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G by 31 points (76/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — 45/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for everyday use.