Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $1099 and $153. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 26/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 548,631).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 548631
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 760
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1890
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (58/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $153 vs $1099
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (99/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 47 points higher (73/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G leads (99/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (58/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (99/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 548631 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 1890 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $153 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A17 4G by 618.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $946. Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is cheaper by $946.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (58/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (99/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G by 47 points (73/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 28/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.