Motorola Razr 40 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 56/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 859,516); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 40 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 859516
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1044
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2785
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 32 points higher (88/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 859516 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1044 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2785 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 40 by 74.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (81/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 32 points (88/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.