Motorola Razr 40 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 56/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 859,516); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 40 better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 225g
- Better camera (50/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 859516
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1044
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2785
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 91/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 19 points higher (75/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (80/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (73/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 859516 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1044 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2785 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | — | $548 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 40 by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (95/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (50/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (80/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (73/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 40 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.