Motorola Moto X40 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Moto X40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto X40 leads — 72/100 vs 69/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,757,044); the Motorola Moto X40 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto X40
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Moto X40 better?
- Faster charging: 125W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better camera (65/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto X40 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Moto X40 scores 3 points higher (72/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto X40 leads (65/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto X40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto X40 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto X40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto X40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto X40 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 125W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 60 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, MYUI 5.0 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×74.0×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto X40
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 60MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto X40
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto X40
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 125W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto X40 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Moto X40 by 40.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto X40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto X40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto X40 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto X40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto X40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto X40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto X40 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto X40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto X40 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto X40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto X40 leads on camera score (65/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto X40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto X40 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto X40 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.