Motorola Moto G24 Power vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Moto G24 Power (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 36/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G24 Power has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 346,495); the Motorola Moto G24 Power is noticeably lighter (197g vs 309g).
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 197g vs 309g
- Better portability (50/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1364
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G24 Power vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 33 points higher (69/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power (70/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G24 Power significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G24 Power | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 537 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×74.5×9.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Motorola Moto G24 Power
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Moto G24 Power
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G24 Power
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Moto G24 Power and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Moto G24 Power by 88.2% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power (91/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power (70/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G24 Power significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G24 Power or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G24 Power by 33 points (69/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G24 Power and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G24 Power has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G24 Power or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G24 Power or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G24 Power over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G24 Power is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.