Motorola Moto G100S vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Moto G100S (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $130 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 51/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G100S has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 829,894); the Motorola Moto G100S is noticeably lighter (210g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G100S
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Moto G100S better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 210g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $2899
- Better portability (47/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 829894
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1009
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2892
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G100S vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 18 points higher (69/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G100S — 82/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Moto G100S are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G100S notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G100S | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 829894 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1009 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2892 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $130 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G100S
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G100S
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G100S
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G100S and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Moto G100S by 71.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2769. Motorola Moto G100S was $2769 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Moto G100S are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (52/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G100S notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G100S — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G100S and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G100S has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G100S over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G100S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.