Motorola Moto G 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Moto G 2026 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $200 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 34/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 524,785); the Motorola Moto G 2026 is noticeably lighter (202g vs 309g).
Motorola Moto G 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 202g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $200 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (47/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 23 points higher (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 34/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 leads (96/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (49/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (96/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 167.2×76.4×8.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $200 | $2899 |
Motorola Moto G 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Moto G 2026
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G 2026
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Moto G 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Moto G 2026 by 82.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2699. Motorola Moto G 2026 is cheaper by $2699.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (49/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (96/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 by 23 points (57/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G 2026 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.