Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Motorola Moto G (2023) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 41/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 477,542); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G (2023) doesn't; the Motorola Moto G (2023) is noticeably lighter (189g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) by 28 points (69/100 vs 41/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G (2023)

Performance 41
Display 56
Camera 29
Battery 43
Portability 61
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Motorola Moto G (2023) better?

  • Lighter: 189g vs 309g

  • Better portability (61/100 vs 20/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 477542
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1816
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 29/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (70/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G (2023) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 28 points higher (69/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) (90/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) (52/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (61/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G (2023) Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 477542 2926532
Geekbench Single 746 3013
Geekbench Multi 1816 9287
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 15W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 8 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 512GB
OS Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) — 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP48
Dimensions 164.0×75.0×8.4 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 189 g 309 g
Launch price — $2899

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G (2023)

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Front: 8MP
29
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G (2023)

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G (2023)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G (2023) and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G (2023) Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
41/100
477542 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +83.7%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Moto G (2023) by 83.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G (2023)

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) (90/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) (52/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) (63/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (61/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G (2023) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G (2023) by 28 points (69/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Motorola Moto G (2023) has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G (2023) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 29/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G (2023) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G (2023) over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.