Motorola Frontier 22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Motorola Frontier 22 (2022) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 42/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Motorola Frontier 22 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Frontier 22
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 78
Battery 40
Design 50
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 49
Battery 52
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Motorola Frontier 22 better?
  • Faster charging: 50W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Better camera (78/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Frontier 22 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 15 points higher (57/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 leads (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Frontier 22: The Motorola Frontier 22 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Frontier 22 Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Snapdragon 8 Gen1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2926532
Geekbench Single 3050
Geekbench Multi 9300
Display 6.7" AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 2160x1584
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 50W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 10 MP
Front camera 60 MP 10 MP
RAM 16GB
Storage 128GB 512GB
OS Android 12 Snow Cone Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 309 g
Price $2899
Camera comparison
Motorola Frontier 22
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 60MP
78
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
49
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Frontier 22
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Frontier 22
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 50W
  • Wireless: 50W
40
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Frontier 22
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Motorola Frontier 22 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Frontier 22 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Motorola Frontier 22 has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Motorola Frontier 22 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Frontier 22 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Motorola Frontier 22 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.