Motorola Frontier 22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Frontier 22 (2022) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Frontier 22 leads — 71/100 vs 69/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,294,871).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Frontier 22
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Frontier 22 better?
- Faster charging: 50W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 68/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Frontier 22 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Frontier 22 scores 2 points higher (71/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Frontier 22 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1294871 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 50W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 60 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | — | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Frontier 22
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 60MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Frontier 22
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Frontier 22
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Frontier 22 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Frontier 22 by 55.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Frontier 22
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (90/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Frontier 22 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Frontier 22 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Frontier 22 has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Frontier 22 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Frontier 22 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Frontier 22 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.