Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 71/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,726,358); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 130); the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Edge 40 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 125W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1726358
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 20 points higher (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Edge 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1726358 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 125W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 60 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×74.0×8.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 60MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 125W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Edge 40 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Edge 40 Pro by 59.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro (96/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Pro by 20 points (91/100 vs 71/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 40 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Edge 40 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.